Time
management
Time management is the act or process of planning and exercising conscious control over the
amount of time spent on specific activities, especially to increase effectiveness,efficiency or productivity.
It
is a meta-activity with the goal to maximize the overall benefit of a set
of other activities within the boundary condition of a limited amount of time.
Time
management may be aided by a range of skills, tools, and techniques used to manage time when accomplishing specific tasks,
projects, and goals complying with a due date. Initially, time management
referred to just business or work activities, but eventually the term broadened
to include personal activities as well. A time management system is a designed
combination of processes, tools, techniques, and methods. Time management is
usually a necessity in any project development as it determines the project completion time and scope.
The
major themes arising from the literature on time management include the
following:
·
Creating an environment conducive to
effectiveness
·
Carrying out activity around those priorities
·
The related process of reduction of time spent
on non-priorities
·
Incentives to modify behavior to ensure
compliance with time-related deadlines.
Time
management has been considered to be a subset of different concepts such as:
·
Project management. Time Management can be considered to be a project management
subset and is more commonly known as project planning and project scheduling. Time Management has
also been identified as one of the core functions identified in project
management.[1]
·
Attention management: Attention Management relates to the management of cognitive resources, and in particular the time that
humans allocate their mind (and organize the minds of their employees) to
conduct some activities.
Some[which?] time-management literature stresses tasks related to the
creation of an environment conducive to "real" effectiveness. These
strategies include principles such as:
·
"protecting one's time" by
insulation, isolation and delegation
·
"recovering from bad time-habits" - recovery from
underlying psychological problems, e.g. procrastination
Writers[who?] on creating an environment for effectiveness refer to such
matters as having a tidy office or home for unleashing creativity, and the need
to protect "prime time". Literature also focuses on overcoming chronic psychological issues such as
procrastination.
Excessive
and chronic inability to manage time effectively may result from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
(ADHD) or Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD).Diagnostic criteria include a sense of underachievement,
difficulty getting organized, trouble getting started, many projects going
simultaneously and trouble with follow-through.[2][page needed] Some authors focus on the prefrontal cortex which is the most recently evolved part of the
brain. It controls the functions of attention-span, impulse-control,
organization, learning from experience and self-monitoring, among others. Some
authors argue that changing the way the prefrontal
cortex works is possible and offer a solution.[3]
Setting priorities and goals
Time
management strategies are often associated with the recommendation to set
personal goals. The literature stresses themes such as -
·
"Set gravitational goals" - that
attract actions automatically
These
goals are recorded and may be broken down into a project,
an action plan, or a simple task list. For individual tasks
or for goals, an importance rating may be established, deadlines may be set,
and priorities assigned. This process results in a plan with a task list or a
schedule or calendar of activities. Authors may recommend a daily, weekly, monthly
or other planning periods associated with different scope of planning or
review. This is done in various ways, as follows.
ABC analysis
A
technique that has been used in business management for a long time is the
categorization of large data into groups. These groups are often marked A, B,
and C—hence the name. Activities are ranked by these general criteria:
·
A – Tasks that are perceived as being urgent and important,
·
B – Tasks that are important but not urgent,
·
C – Tasks that are neither urgent nor important. (This list could
also include tasks that are urgent but not important.)
Each
group is then rank-ordered by priority. To further refine the prioritization,
some individuals choose to then force-rank all "B" items as either
"A" or "C". ABC analysis can incorporate more than three
groups.
Pareto analysis
This
is the idea 80% of tasks can be completed in 20% of the disposable time. The
remaining 20% of tasks will take up 80% of the time. This principle is used to
sort tasks into two parts. According to this form of Pareto analysis it is recommended that tasks that fall into the
first category be assigned a higher priority.
The 80-20-rule can also be applied to increase productivity:
it is assumed that 80% of the productivity can be achieved by doing 20% of the
tasks. Similarly, 80% of results can be attributed to 20% of activity. If productivity is the aim of time management,
then these tasks should be prioritized higher. This view of the Pareto Principle is explored further inThe 4-Hour Workweek by Timothy Ferriss.
It
depends on the method adopted to complete the task. There is always a simpler
and easier way to complete the task. If one uses a complex way, it will be time
consuming. So, one should always try to find out the alternate ways to complete
each task.
The Eisenhower Method
A basic "Eisenhower box" to help
evaluate urgency and importance. Items may be placed at more precise points
within each quadrant.
Using
the Eisenhower Decision Principle, all tasks are evaluated using the criteria
important/unimportant and urgent/not urgent, and then placed in according quadrants in an Eisenhower Matrix (also known as an "Eisenhower Box"
or "Eisenhower Decision Matrix". Tasks are then handled thusly: those in...
1.
Important/Urgent
quadrants are done immediately and personally(e.g., crises, deadlines, problems
2.
Important/Not Urgent
quadrants get an end date and are done personally (e.g.,. relationships, planning, recreation
This
method is said to have been used by U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, and is outlined in a quote attributed to him: What is important is seldom urgent and what is
urgent is seldom important.[9]
This
is the idea that there are actions that you invest in them once and which
produce over time in different channels. Writing a book is such an action,
because it requires a one-time effort, and once you finish it, it continues
serving you.[10]
POSEC
is an acronym for Prioritize
by Organizing, Streamlining, Economizing and Contributing. The method dictates a template which
emphasizes an average individual's immediate sense of emotional and monetary
security. It suggests that by attending to one's personal responsibilities
first, an individual is better positioned to shoulder collective
responsibilities.
Inherent
in the acronym is a hierarchy of self-realization, which mirrors Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs:
1.
Prioritize - Your time and define your life by
goals.
2.
Organize - Things you have to accomplish
regularly to be successful (family and finances).
3.
Streamline - Things you may not like to do, but
must do (work and chores).
4.
Economize - Things you should do or may even
like to do, but they're not pressingly urgent (pastimes and socializing).
5.
Contribute - By paying attention to the few
remaining things that make a difference (social obligations).
There
are also time management approaches that emphasise the need for more focused
and simple implementation, including the approach of "Going with the
Flow" - natural rhythms, Eastern philosophy. More unconventional time
usage techniques, such as those discussed in Where Did Time Fly, include concepts that can be paraphrased as "Less is
More", which de-emphasizes the importance of squeezing every minute of
one's time, as suggested in traditional time management schemes.[11]
A task list (also to-do list or things-to-do)
is a list of tasks to be completed, such
as chores or steps toward completing a project. It is an inventory tool which serves as an alternative or
supplement to memory.
Task
lists are used in self-management, grocery lists, business management, project management, and software development. It may involve more than one list.
When
one of the items on a task list is accomplished, the task is checked or crossed off. The traditional method is to write these on a piece of
paper with a pen or pencil, usually on a note pad or clip-board. Task lists can also have
the form of paper or software checklists.
Writer
Julie Morgenstern suggests "do's and don'ts" of time management that
include:
·
Map out everything
that is important, by making a task list
·
Create "an oasis
of time" for one to control
·
Say "No"
·
Set priorities
·
Don't drop everything
Numerous
digital equivalents are now available, including Personal information management (PIM) applications and most PDAs. There are also
several web-based task list applications, many of which are free.
Task list organization
Task
lists are often tiered. The simplest tiered system includes a general to-do
list (or task-holding file) to record all the tasks the person needs to
accomplish, and a daily to-do list which is created each day by transferring
tasks from the general to-do list.
Task
lists are often prioritized:
·
A daily list of things
to do, numbered in the order of their importance, and done in that order one at
a time until daily time allows, is attributed to consultant Ivy Lee (1877-1934) as the most profitable advice
received by Charles M. Schwab (1862-1939), president of the Bethlehem Steel Corporation.[13][14][15]
·
An early advocate of
"ABC" prioritization was Alan Lakein, in 1973. In his system "A" items
were the most important ("A-1" the most important within that group),
"B" next most important, "C" least important.
·
A particular method of
applying the ABC method assigns "A" to tasks to be done
within a day, "B" a week, and "C" a month.
·
To prioritize a daily
task list, one either records the tasks in the order of highest priority, or assigns them a number after they are listed ("1" for highest priority,
"2" for second highest priority, etc.) which indicates in which order
to execute the tasks. The latter method is generally faster, allowing the tasks
to be recorded more quickly
·
Another way of
prioritizing compulsory tasks (group A) is to put the most unpleasant one
first. When it’s done, the rest of the list feels easier. Groups B and C can
benefit from the same idea, but instead of doing the first task (which is the
most unpleasant) right away, it gives motivation to do other tasks from the
list to avoid the first one.
·
A completely different
approach which argues against prioritising altogether was put forward by
British author Mark Forster in his book "Do
It Tomorrow and Other Secrets of Time Management". This is based on the
idea of operating "closed" to-do lists, instead of the traditional
"open" to-do list. He argues that the traditional never-ending to-do lists
virtually guarantees that some of your work will be left undone. This approach
advocates getting all your work done, every day, and if you are unable to
achieve it helps you diagnose where you are going wrong and what needs to
change.[17]
Various
writers have stressed potential difficulties with to-do lists such as the
following:
·
Management of the list
can take over from implementing it. This could be caused by procrastination by prolonging the planning activity. This is
akin to analysis paralysis. As with any activity, there's a point of diminishing returns.
·
Some level of detail
must be taken for granted for a task system to work. Rather than put
"clean the kitchen", "clean the bedroom", and "clean
the bathroom", it is more efficient to put "housekeeping" and
save time spent writing and reduce the system's administrative load (each task
entered into the system generates a cost in time and effort to manage it, aside
from the execution of the task). The risk of consolidating tasks, however, is
that "housekeeping" in this example may prove overwhelming or
nebulously defined, which will either increase the risk of procrastination, or
a mismanaged project.[citation needed]
·
Listing routine tasks
wastes time. If you are in the habit of brushing your teeth every day, then
there is no reason to put it down on the task list. The same goes for getting
out of bed, fixing meals, etc. If you need to track routine tasks, then a
standard list or chart may be useful, to avoid the procedure of manually
listing these items over and over.[citation needed]
·
To remain flexible, a
task system must allow for disaster. A company must be ready for a disaster.
Even if it is a small disaster, if no one made time for this situation, it canmetastasize, potentially causing damage to the company .[18]
·
To avoid getting stuck
in a wasteful pattern, the task system should also include regular (monthly,
semi-annual, and annual) planning and system-evaluation sessions, to weed out
inefficiencies and ensure the user is headed in the direction he or she truly
desires.[19]
·
If some time is not
regularly spent on achieving long-range goals, the individual may get stuck in
a perpetual holding pattern on short-term plans, like staying at a particular
job much longer than originally planned.[citation needed]
Many
companies use time tracking software to track employee's working time, billable hours etc. e.g. law practice management software.
Many
software products for time management support multiple users. They allow the
person to give tasks to other users and use the software for communication.
Task
list applications may be thought of as lightweight personal information manager or project management software.
Modern
task list applications may have built-in task
hierarchy (tasks are composed of subtasks which again may contain subtasks), may support multiple methods of filtering and
ordering the list of tasks, and may allow one to associate arbitrarily long
notes for each task.
In
contrast to the concept of allowing the person to use multiple filtering
methods, at least one software product additionally contains a mode where the
software will attempt to dynamically determine the best tasks for any given
moment.
Time management systems
Time
management systems often include a time clock or web based application used to track an
employee’s work hours. Time management systems give employers insights into
their workforce, allowing them to see, plan and manage employees' time. Doing
so allows employers to control labor costs and increase productivity. A time
management system automates processes, which eliminates paper work and tedious
tasks.
GTD Getting Things Done was created by David Allen and the basic idea
behind this method is to finish all the small tasks immediately and a big task
is to be divided into smaller tasks to start completing now. The reasoning
behind this is to avoid the information overload or "brain freeze" which is likely to occur when there
are hundreds of tasks. The thrust of GTD is to encourage the user to get their
tasks and ideas out and on paper and organized as quickly as possible so
they're easy to manage and see.
Pomodoro was created by
Francesco Cirillo in the early 90’s with the idea that frequent breaks makes
the user more productive as long as they stay committed to the work and don’t
allow themselves to be distracted. The Pomodoro technique is very simple:
measure the task before the user begins and divide it into 25-minute intervals.
Each 25-minute interval is measured as one “Pomodoro” and between each Pomodoro
there is a short break (usually 5 minutes). After doing 4 “Pomodoros” the user
can take a longer break.
Triskelion
system is the time management system created by Gamelearn.
Triskelion time management system is learnt by playing the graphic-adventure
game Triskelion. The system is based on the three pillars of time management: manage,
plan, and do-it now.
Elimination of non-priorities
Time
management also covers how to eliminate tasks that do not provide the
individual or organization value.
According
to Sandberg,task lists "aren't the key to
productivity [that] they're cracked up to be". He reports an estimated
"30% of listers spend more time managing their lists than [they do]
completing what's on them".
Hendrickson
asserts that rigid adherence to task lists can create
a "tyranny of the to-do list" that forces one to "waste time on
unimportant activities".